AWS Network Load Balancer – NLB

AWS Network Load Balancer – NLB

  • Network Load Balancer – NLB operates at the connection level (Layer 4), routing connections to targets – EC2 instances, and containers based on IP protocol data.
  • NLB is suited for load balancing of TCP, UDP, TLS, and QUIC traffic.
  • NLB is capable of handling millions of requests per second while maintaining ultra-low latencies (~100 ms vs 400 ms for ALB)
  • NLB is optimized to handle sudden and volatile traffic patterns while using a single static IP address per Availability Zone.
  • NLB also supports TLS termination, preserves the source IP of the clients, and provides stable IP support and Zonal isolation.
  • NLB supports long-running connections that are very useful for WebSocket-type applications.
  • NLB is integrated with other AWS services such as Auto Scaling, EC2 Container Service (ECS), CloudFormation, and AWS Certificate Manager (ACM).
  • NLB supports connections from clients over VPC peering, AWS-managed VPN, Direct Connect, and third-party VPN solutions.
  • NLB now supports security groups (since Aug 2023), enabling filtering of traffic that NLB accepts and forwards to applications.
  • For TCP traffic,
    • the load balancer selects a target using a flow hash algorithm based on the protocol, source IP address, source port, destination IP address, destination port, and TCP sequence number.
    • TCP connections from a client having different source ports and sequence numbers and can be routed to different targets.
    • Each individual TCP connection is routed to a single target for the life of the connection.
  • For UDP traffic,
    • the load balancer selects a target using a flow hash algorithm based on the protocol, source IP address, source port, destination IP address, and destination port.
    • A UDP flow has the same source and destination, so it is consistently routed to a single target throughout its lifetime.
    • Different UDP flows have different source IP addresses and ports, so they can be routed to different targets.
  • For QUIC traffic,
    • NLB supports QUIC protocol in passthrough mode, forwarding QUIC traffic directly to targets without terminating sessions.
    • Session stickiness is maintained using QUIC Connection IDs, even when client IP addresses change during network roaming.
    • QUIC and TCP_QUIC listeners are not allowed on dualstack load balancers or load balancers with associated security groups.
  • back-end server authentication (MTLS) is not supported on NLB. mTLS is only supported on ALB.

Classic Load Balancer vs Application Load Balancer vs Network Load Balancer

Refer Blog Post @ Classic Load Balancer vs Application Load Balancer vs Network Load Balancer

Network Load Balancer Features

Connection-based Layer 4 Load Balancing

  • Allows load balancing of TCP, TLS, UDP, TCP_UDP, QUIC, and TCP_QUIC traffic, routing connections to targets – EC2 instances, microservices, and containers.

High Availability

  • is highly available.
  • accepts incoming traffic from clients and distributes this traffic across the targets within the same AZ (except for Cross-zone load balancing).
  • monitors the health of its registered targets and routes the traffic only to healthy targets
  • if a health check fails and an unhealthy target is detected, it stops routing traffic to that target and reroutes traffic to remaining healthy targets.
  • if configured with multiple AZs and if all the targets in a single AZ fail, it routes traffic to healthy targets in the other AZs

Availability Zones

  • can be used to route traffic across multiple Availability Zones.
  • However, AZ must be enabled before the traffic is routed to that AZ.
  • AZ can be enabled, even after the NLB creation.
  • AZ can now be disabled/removed (since Feb 2025) – you can remove one or more availability zones from NLB by updating the list of enabled subnets using the ELB API, CLI, or Console.
  • Cross-zone load balancing works only for AZs enabled with NLB.

High Throughput

  • is designed to handle traffic as it grows and can load balance millions of requests/sec.
  • can also handle sudden volatile traffic patterns.

Low Latency

  • offers extremely low latencies for latency-sensitive applications.

Security Groups

  • NLB now supports security groups (since August 2023), enabling you to filter the traffic that your NLB accepts and forwards to your application.
  • Security groups can be configured with rules to ensure that NLB only accepts traffic from trusted IP addresses and centrally enforces access control policies.
  • Security group inbound rules can be enforced even when the load balancer converts IPv6 traffic to IPv4 or when targets are in peered VPCs.
  • Security group association is optional – NLBs can still be created without security groups for backward compatibility.
  • QUIC and TCP_QUIC listeners are not supported on NLBs with associated security groups.

Cross Zone Load Balancing

  • enables cross-zone loading balancing only after creating the NLB
  • is disabled, by default, and charges apply for inter-az traffic.
  • only works for the AZs that are enabled on the NLB.
  • can also be configured at the target group level, allowing per-target-group cross-zone settings.

Sticky Sessions

  • Sticky sessions (source IP affinity) are a mechanism to route requests from the same client to the same target.
  • Stickiness is defined at the target group level.
  • For QUIC traffic, stickiness is maintained using QUIC Connection IDs.

Load Balancing using IP addresses as Targets

  • allows load balancing of any application hosted in AWS or on-premises using IP addresses of the application backends as targets.
  • allows load balancing to an application backend hosted on any IP address and any interface on an instance.
  • ability to load balance across AWS and on-premises resources help migrate-to-cloud, burst-to-cloud or failover-to-cloud.
  • applications hosted in on-premises locations can be used as targets over a Direct Connect connection.
  • supports registering targets using IPv6 addresses (since Oct 2023).

Preserve Source IP Address

  • preserves client-side source IP allowing the back-end to see the client IP address.
  • Target groups can be created with target type as instance ID or IP address.
    • If targets are registered by instance ID or ECS tasks, the source IP addresses of the clients are preserved and provided to the applications.
    • If targets are registered by IP address
      • for TCP & TLS, the source IP addresses are the private IP addresses of the load balancer nodes. Use Proxy Protocol.
      • for UDP & TCP_UDP, it is enabled by default and the source IP addresses of the clients are preserved.

Static IP support

  • automatically provides a static IP per Availability Zone (subnet) that can be used by applications as the front-end IP of the load balancer.
  • creates a network interface for each enabled AZ. Each load balancer node in the AZ uses this network interface to get a static IP address.
  • Internet-facing load balancer can optionally associate one Elastic IP address per subnet.

Elastic IP support

  • an Elastic IP per Availability Zone (subnet) can also be assigned, optionally, thereby providing a fixed IP.

Configurable TCP Idle Timeout

  • TCP idle timeout can now be configured to any value between 60-6000 seconds (since Sep 2024).
  • The default idle timeout for TCP flows is 350 seconds.
  • Previously, this was a fixed value of 350 seconds that could not be modified.
  • Configurable timeout helps reduce latency for long-lived traffic flows by maintaining target stickiness for the optimal duration.
  • The connection idle timeout for TLS listeners remains fixed at 350 seconds.
  • UDP connections have a fixed 120 second idle timeout.
  • Clients or targets can use TCP keepalive packets to restart the idle timeout.

Health Checks

  • supports both network and application target health checks using HTTP, HTTPS, and TCP.
  • Network-level health check
    • is based on the overall response of the underlying target (instance or a container) to normal traffic.
    • target is marked unavailable if it is slow or unable to respond to new connection requests
  • Application-level health check
    • is based on a specific URL on a given target to test the application health deeper
  • Target group health settings can be configured to define minimum healthy target count/percentage and actions when thresholds are not met (since Nov 2022).
  • Unhealthy target connection termination can be disabled, allowing active connections to persist even when targets fail health checks (since Oct 2023).

DNS Fail-over

  • integrates with Route 53
  • Route 53 will direct traffic to load balancer nodes in other AZs, if there are no healthy targets with NLB or if the NLB itself is unhealthy
  • if NLB is unresponsive, Route 53 will remove the unavailable load balancer IP address from service and direct traffic to an alternate Network Load Balancer in another region.

Zonal Shift and Autoshift (Route 53 ARC)

  • NLB integrates with Amazon Application Recovery Controller (ARC) for zonal shift capabilities.
  • Zonal Shift allows you to manually shift NLB traffic away from an impaired Availability Zone.
  • Zonal Autoshift allows AWS to automatically shift traffic away from an AZ when it detects a potential failure, reducing time to recovery.
  • Zonal shift is disabled by default and must be enabled on each NLB.
  • Works only when cross-zone load balancing is turned off (the default for NLB).
  • Provides automated recovery without manual intervention during AZ impairments.

Integration with AWS Services

Long-lived TCP Connections

  • supports long-lived TCP connections ideal for WebSocket-type of applications
  • with configurable idle timeout (60-6000 seconds), long-lived connections can be maintained optimally.

Central API Support

  • uses the same API as Application Load Balancer.
  • enables you to work with target groups, health checks, and load balance across multiple ports on the same EC2 instance to support containerized applications.

Robust Monitoring and Auditing

  • integrated with CloudWatch to report Network Load Balancer metrics.
  • CloudWatch provides metrics such as Active Flow count, Healthy Host Count, New Flow Count, Processed bytes, ZonalHealthStatus, and more.
  • integrated with CloudTrail to track API calls to the NLB
  • Resource Map (since Apr 2024) provides a visual representation of load balancer resources and their relationships in the console.

Enhanced Logging

  • NLB access logs capture information about TLS requests sent to the load balancer, stored in Amazon S3.
  • Flow Logs feature helps record all requests sent to the load balancer.
  • Flow Logs capture information about the IP traffic going to and from network interfaces in the VPC.
  • Flow log data is stored using CloudWatch Logs.

Zonal Isolation

  • is designed for application architectures in a single zone.
  • can be enabled in a single AZ to support architectures that require zonal isolation
  • automatically fails-over to other healthy AZs, if something fails in an AZ
  • it’s recommended to configure the load balancer and targets in multiple AZs for achieving high availability

Zonal DNS Name

  • supports DNS names for each of its nodes.
  • by default, resolving the Regional NLB DNS name returns the IP address for all NLB nodes in all enabled AZs.
  • can be used to determine the IP address of each node.
  • useful to minimize latency and inter-az data transfer costs.
  • Zonal DNS Affinity (since Oct 2023) allows clients resolving the load balancer DNS to receive an IP address in the same AZ they are in, supporting affinity levels of 100%, 85%, or 0%.

TLS Offloading

  • NLB supports client TLS session termination, allowing TLS termination tasks to be offloaded to the load balancer while preserving the source IP address for back-end applications.
  • Predefined security policies can be selected for TLS listeners to meet compliance and security standards.
  • Supports SNI (Server Name Indication) to serve multiple secure websites using a single TLS listener.
  • Supports RSA 3072-bit and ECDSA 256/384/521-bit certificates via ACM (since Jan 2024).
  • Supports FIPS 140-3 cryptographic modules for TLS termination (since Nov 2023).
  • Supports Post-Quantum TLS (PQ-TLS) key exchange using ML-KEM768 to protect against “Harvest Now, Decrypt Later” (HNDL) attacks (since Nov 2025).
  • ALPN (Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation) policies supported for TLS listeners.

IP Address Types

  • IPv4 – clients connect using IPv4 addresses only.
  • Dualstack – clients can connect using both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
  • UDP over IPv6 is supported for dualstack load balancers (since Oct 2024).
  • Internal dualstack NLB access through the internet gateway is blocked to prevent unintended internet access.

Weighted Target Groups

  • NLB supports weighted target groups (since Nov 2025), allowing multiple target groups per listener with configurable weights ranging from 0 to 999.
  • Enables blue/green deployments, canary deployments, application migration, and A/B testing with zero downtime.
  • Eliminates the need for multiple load balancers to perform traffic splitting.
  • Provides precise control over traffic distribution between target groups.

QUIC Protocol Support

  • NLB supports QUIC protocol in passthrough mode (since Nov 2025), forwarding QUIC traffic directly to targets without terminating sessions.
  • Maintains session stickiness using QUIC Connection IDs, even when client IP addresses change during network roaming.
  • Ideal for mobile-first applications where clients frequently switch between cellular and WiFi networks.
  • Reduces end-to-end application latency by 25-30% compared to traditional protocols.
  • TCP_QUIC listeners support HTTP/3 applications with automatic fallback to HTTPS on TCP 443.
  • Limitations: QUIC/TCP_QUIC listeners are not allowed on dualstack load balancers, load balancers with associated security groups, or NLBs with UDP/TCP_UDP listeners. Only one QUIC or TCP_QUIC listener allowed per NLB.

Secondary IPv4 Addresses

  • NLB supports configuring up to 7 additional (secondary) IPv4 addresses on its egress network interfaces (since Jul 2025).
  • Increases concurrent connections per target from 64K to 512K by overcoming the 64K TCP ephemeral port constraint.
  • Helps resolve port allocation errors in high-connection-count scenarios where source IP preservation cannot be used.
  • Configurable via the secondary_ips.auto_assigned.per_subnet attribute (valid range: 0-7).
  • Once set, this value cannot be decreased.

LCU Capacity Reservations

  • NLB supports Load Balancer Capacity Unit (LCU) Reservations (since Nov 2024) to reserve a static minimum capacity.
  • Ideal for planned events with sudden high traffic (product launches, sales, traffic migrations).
  • NLB continues to auto-scale based on traffic, but capacity won’t go below the configured minimum.
  • Each LCU equals 2.2 Mbps of processed bandwidth.
  • You pay for reserved LCUs and any additional usage above the reservation.

Advantages over Classic Load Balancer

  • Ability to handle volatile workloads and scale to millions of requests per second, without the need of pre-warming
  • Support for static IP/Elastic IP addresses for the load balancer
  • Support for registering targets by IP address, including targets outside the VPC (on-premises) for the load balancer.
  • Support for routing requests to multiple applications on a single EC2 instance. A single instance or IP address can be registered with the same target group using multiple ports.
  • Support for containerized applications. Using Dynamic port mapping, ECS can select an unused port when scheduling a task and register the task with a target group using this port.
  • Support for monitoring the health of each service independently, as health checks are defined at the target group level and many CloudWatch metrics are reported at the target group level. Attaching a target group to an Auto Scaling group enables scaling each service dynamically based on demand
  • Support for security groups, enabling centralized access control policies
  • Support for QUIC protocol for low-latency mobile-first applications
  • Support for weighted target groups enabling blue/green and canary deployments

Network Load Balancer Limitations

  • can’t associate Security Groups with NLBsNLB now supports security groups (since Aug 2023)
  • can’t disable/remove an AZ once you enable itNLB now supports removing AZs (since Feb 2025)
  • can’t modify ENIs created by NLB in each AZ
  • can’t change EIPs and Private IPs attached to the ENIs after NLB creation.
  • can’t register EC2 instances by instance ID for instances in another VPC even if VPC peering is done.
  • QUIC/TCP_QUIC listeners not allowed on dualstack NLBs or NLBs with security groups.
  • mTLS (Mutual TLS) is not supported – only available on ALB.
  • TLS listener idle timeout is fixed at 350 seconds and cannot be modified.

Network Load Balancer with AWS PrivateLink

  • Interface Endpoints can be used to create custom applications in VPC and configure them as an AWS PrivateLink-powered service (referred to as an endpoint service) exposed through a Network Load Balancer. The custom applications can be hosted within AWS or on-premises.

Network Load Balancer Pricing

  • charged for each hour or partial hour that an NLB is running and the number of Load Balancer Capacity Units (LCU) used per hour.
  • An LCU is a metric for determining NLB pricing
  • An LCU defines the maximum resource consumed in any one of the dimensions (new connections/flows, active connections/flows, bandwidth and rule evaluations) the Network Load Balancer processes your traffic.
  • If using LCU Capacity Reservations, you pay for reserved LCUs per minute plus any additional LCUs used beyond the reservation.

AWS Certification Exam Practice Questions

  • Questions are collected from Internet and the answers are marked as per my knowledge and understanding (which might differ with yours).
  • AWS services are updated everyday and both the answers and questions might be outdated soon, so research accordingly.
  • AWS exam questions are not updated to keep up the pace with AWS updates, so even if the underlying feature has changed the question might not be updated
  • Open to further feedback, discussion and correction.
  1. A company wants to use load balancer for their application. However, the company wants to forward the requests without any header modification. What service should the company use?
    1. Classic Load Balancer
    2. Network Load Balancer
    3. Application Load Balancer
    4. Use Route 53
  2. A company is hosting an application in AWS for third party access. The third party needs to whitelist the application based on the IP. Which AWS service can the company use in the whitelisting of the IP address?
    1. AWS Application Load Balancer
    2. AWS Classic Load balancer
    3. AWS Network Load Balancer
    4. AWS Route 53
  3. A company wants to restrict inbound traffic to their Network Load Balancer to only specific trusted IP ranges. What is the recommended approach?
    1. Use NACLs on the NLB subnet
    2. Configure WAF with NLB
    3. Associate a security group with the NLB and configure inbound rules
    4. Use Route 53 health checks to filter traffic
  4. A company needs to perform a blue/green deployment for a TCP-based application running behind a Network Load Balancer. They want to gradually shift traffic from the old version to the new version. What is the MOST operationally efficient approach?
    1. Create two NLBs and use Route 53 weighted routing
    2. Use AWS CodeDeploy with two target groups
    3. Configure weighted target groups on the NLB listener to distribute traffic between blue and green target groups
    4. Manually deregister targets from the existing target group and register new targets
  5. A mobile gaming company uses Network Load Balancer for their real-time game servers. Players frequently switch between WiFi and cellular networks, causing connection drops. Which NLB feature helps maintain session continuity during network changes?
    1. Source IP affinity sticky sessions
    2. TCP keepalive packets
    3. QUIC protocol support with Connection ID-based stickiness
    4. Cross-zone load balancing
  6. A company runs a high-throughput application behind an NLB with IP-type targets. They are experiencing TCP port allocation errors because they have over 64,000 concurrent connections to a single target. What should they do?
    1. Enable cross-zone load balancing to distribute traffic
    2. Switch to instance-type targets
    3. Configure secondary IPv4 addresses on the NLB egress interface
    4. Add more targets to the target group
  7. A company wants to ensure their NLB can handle a planned traffic spike during a product launch event without relying on auto-scaling warm-up time. What feature should they use?
    1. Pre-warming request to AWS Support
    2. Cross-zone load balancing
    3. Multiple target groups with higher weights
    4. LCU Capacity Reservations
  8. An organization wants to protect their TLS-terminated NLB traffic against future quantum computing threats. Which NLB feature addresses this concern?
    1. FIPS 140-3 security policies
    2. Post-Quantum TLS (PQ-TLS) security policies with ML-KEM768
    3. RSA 3072-bit certificates
    4. ECDSA 521-bit certificates

References

AWS Documentation – Network Load Balancer

AWS Documentation – Network Load Balancers

AWS Documentation – NLB Listeners

AWS Documentation – NLB Security Groups

AWS Documentation – Zonal Shift for NLB

AWS Documentation – NLB Capacity Reservations

AWS Elastic Load Balancer – ELB

AWS Elastic Load Balancer – ELB

  • Elastic Load Balancer allows the incoming traffic to be distributed automatically across multiple healthy EC2 instances.
  • ELB serves as a single point of contact for the client.
  • ELB helps to be transparent and increases the application availability by allowing the addition or removal of multiple EC2 instances across one or more AZs, without disrupting the overall flow of information.
  • ELB benefits
    • is a distributed system that is fault-tolerant and actively monitored
    • abstracts out the complexity of managing, maintaining, and scaling load balancers
    • serves as the first line of defence against attacks on the network
    • can offload the work of encryption and decryption (SSL termination) so that the EC2 instances can focus on their main work
    • offers integration with Auto Scaling, which ensures enough back-end capacity available to meet varying traffic levels
    • are engineered to not be a single point of failure
  • Elastic Load Balancer, by default, routes each request independently to the registered instance with the smallest load.
  • ELB automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running healthy EC2 instances, if an EC2 instance fails. If a failed EC2 instance is restored, ELB restores the traffic to that instance.
  • Load Balancers are regional only work across AZs within a region

Elastic Load Balancer basic architecture

Application Load Balancer – ALB

Refer to Blog Post @ Application Load Balancer

Network Load Balancer – NLB

Refer to Blog Post @ Network Load Balancer

Gateway Load Balancer – GWLB

Refer to Blog Post @ Gateway Load Balancer

Classic Load Balancer vs Application Load Balancer vs Network Load Balancer

Refer Blog Post @ Classic Load Balancer vs Application Load Balancer vs Network Load Balancer

Elastic Load Balancer Features

Following ELB key concepts apply to all the Elastic Load Balancer types

Scaling ELB

  • Each ELB is allocated and configured with a default capacity.
  • ELB Controller is the service that stores all the configurations and also monitors the load balancer and manages the capacity that is used to handle the client requests.
  • As the traffic profile changes, the controller service scales the load balancers to handle more requests, scaling equally in all AZs.
  • ELB increases its capacity by utilizing either larger resources (scale up – resources with higher performance characteristics) or more individual resources (scale-out).
  • AWS handles the scaling of the ELB capacity and this scaling is different to the scaling of the EC2 instances to which the ELB routes its request, which is dealt with by Auto Scaling.
  • Time required for Elastic Load Balancing to scale can range from 1 to 7 minutes, depending on the changes in the traffic profile
  • When an Availability Zone is enabled for the load balancer, Elastic Load Balancing creates a load balancer node in the Availability Zone.
  • By default, each load balancer node distributes traffic across the registered targets in its Availability Zone only.

Pre-Warming ELB

NOTE – AWS documentation does not include Pre-warming now

  • ELB works best with a gradual increase in traffic
  • AWS is able to scale automatically and handle a vast majority of use cases
  • However, in certain scenarios, if there is a flash traffic spike expected or a load test cannot be configured to gradually increase traffic, recommended contacting AWS support to have the load balancer “pre-warmed”
  • AWS will help Pre-warming the ELB, by configuring the load balancer to have the appropriate level of capacity based on the expected traffic
  • AWS would need the information for the start, end dates, and expected request rate per second with the total size of request/response.

DNS Resolution

  • ELB is scaled automatically depending on the traffic profile.
  • When scaled, the Elastic Load Balancing service will update the Domain Name System (DNS) record of the load balancer so that the new resources have their respective IP addresses registered in DNS.
  • DNS record created includes a Time-to-Live (TTL) setting of 60 seconds
  • By default, ELB will return multiple IP addresses when clients perform a DNS resolution, with the records being randomly ordered on each DNS resolution request.
  • It is recommended that clients will re-lookup the DNS at least every 60 seconds to take advantage of the increased capacity

Load Balancer Types

  • Internet Load Balancer
    • An Internet-facing load balancer takes requests from clients over the Internet and distributes them across the EC2 instances that are registered with the load balancer.
  • Internal Load Balancer – 
    • An Internal load balancer routes traffic to EC2 instances in private subnets.

Availability Zones/Subnets

  • Elastic Load Balancer should have at least one subnet attached.
  • Elastic Load Balancing allows subnets to be added and creates a load balancer node in each of the Availability Zone where the subnet resides.
  • Only one subnet per AZ can be attached to the ELB. Attaching a subnet with an AZ already attached replaces the existing subnet
  • Each Subnet must have a CIDR block with at least a /27 bitmask and has at least 8 free IP addresses, which ELB uses to establish connections with the back-end instances.
  • For High Availability, it is recommended to attach one subnet per AZ for at least two AZs, even if the instances are in a single subnet.
  • Subnets can be attached or detached from the ELB and it would start or stop sending requests to the instances in the subnet accordingly

Security Groups & NACL

  • Security groups & NACLs should allow Inbound traffic, on the load balancer listener port, from the Client for an Internet ELB or VPC CIDR for an Internal ELB
  • Security groups & NACLs should allow Outbound traffic to the back-end instances on both the instance listener port and the health check port
  • NACLs, in addition, should allow responses on the ephemeral ports
  • All EC2 instances should allow incoming traffic from ELB

SSL Negotiation Configuration

  • For HTTPS load balancers, Elastic Load Balancing uses a Secure Socket Layer (SSL) negotiation configuration, known as a security policy, to negotiate SSL connections between a client and the load balancer.
  • A security policy is a combination of SSL protocols, SSL ciphers, and the Server Order Preference option
    • Elastic Load Balancing supports the following versions of the SSL protocol TLS 1.2, TLS 1.1,  TLS 1.0, SSL 3.0, SSL 2.0 (deprecated now)
    • SSL protocols use several SSL ciphers to encrypt data over the Internet.
    • An SSL cipher is an encryption algorithm that uses encryption keys to create a coded message. SSL protocols use several SSL ciphers to encrypt data over the internet.
    • Elastic Load Balancing supports the Server Order Preference option for negotiating connections between a client and a load balancer.
    • During the SSL connection negotiation process, this allows the load balancer to control and select the first cipher in its list that is in the client’s list of ciphers instead of the default behaviour of checking to match the first cipher in the client’s list with the server’s list.
  • Elastic Load Balancer allows using Predefined Security Policies or creating a Custom Security Policy for specific needs. If none is specified, ELB selects the latest Predefined Security Policy.
  • Elastic Load Balancer supports multiple certificates using Server Name Indication (SNI)
    • If the hostname provided by a client matches a single certificate in the certificate list, the load balancer selects this certificate.
    • If a hostname provided by a client matches multiple certificates in the certificate list, the load balancer selects the best certificate that the client can support.
  • Classic Load Balancer does not support multiple certificates
  • ALB and NLB support multiple certificates

Health Checks

  • Load balancer performs health checks on all registered instances, whether the instance is in a healthy state or an unhealthy state.
  • Load balancer performs health checks to discover the availability of the EC2 instances and periodically sends pings, attempts connections, or sends requests to health check the EC2 instances.
  • Health check is InService for the status of healthy instances and OutOfService for unhealthy ones.
  • Load balancer sends a request to each registered instance at the Ping Protocol, Ping Port and Ping Path every HealthCheck Interval seconds. It waits for the instance to respond within the Response Timeout period. If the health checks exceed the Unhealthy Threshold for consecutive failed responses, the load balancer takes the instance out of service. When the health checks exceed the Healthy Threshold for consecutive successful responses, the load balancer puts the instance back in service.
  • Load balancer only sends requests to the healthy EC2 instances and stops routing requests to the unhealthy instances
  • All ELB types support health checks

Listeners

  • Listeners are the process that checks for connection requests from client
  • Listeners are configured with a protocol and a port for front-end (client to load balancer) connections, and a protocol and a port for back-end (load balancer to back-end instance) connections.
  • Listeners support HTTP, HTTPS, SSL, and TCP protocols
  • An X.509 certificate is required for HTTPS or SSL connections and the load balancer uses the certificate to terminate the connection and then decrypt requests from clients before sending them to the back-end instances.
  • If you want to use SSL, but don’t want to terminate the connection on the load balancer, use TCP for connections from the client to the load balancer, use the SSL protocol for connections from the load balancer to the back-end application, and deploy certificates on the back-end instances handling requests.
  • If you use an HTTPS/SSL connection for the back end, you can enable authentication on the back-end instance. This authentication can be used to ensure that back-end instances accept only encrypted communication, and to ensure that the back-end instance has the correct certificates.
  • ELB HTTPS listener does not support Client-Side SSL certificates

Idle Connection Timeout

  • For each request that a client makes through a load balancer, it maintains two connections, for each client request, one connection is with the client, and the other connection is to the back-end instance.
  • For each connection, the load balancer manages an idle timeout that is triggered when no data is sent over the connection for a specified time period. If no data has been sent or received, it closes the connection after the idle timeout period (defaults to 60 seconds) has elapsed
  • For lengthy operations, such as file uploads, the idle timeout setting for the connections should be adjusted to ensure that lengthy operations have time to complete.

X-Forwarded Headers & Proxy Protocol Support

  • As the Elastic Load Balancer intercepts the traffic between the client and the back-end servers, the back-end server does not know the IP address, Protocol, and the Port used between the Client and the Load balancer.
  • ELB provides X-Forwarded headers support to help back-end servers track the same when using the HTTP protocol
    • X-Forwarded-For request header to help back-end servers identify the IP address of a client when you use an HTTP or HTTPS load balancer.
    • X-Forwarded-Proto request header to help back-end servers identify the protocol (HTTP/S) that a client used to connect to the server
    • X-Forwarded-Port request header to help back-end servers identify the port that an HTTP or HTTPS load balancer uses to connect to the client.
  • ELB provides Proxy Protocol support to help back-end servers track the same when using non-HTTP protocol or when using HTTPS and not terminating the SSL connection on the load balancer.
    • Proxy Protocol is an Internet protocol used to carry connection information from the source requesting the connection to the destination for which the connection was requested.
    • Elastic Load Balancing uses Proxy Protocol version 1, which uses a human-readable header format with connection information such as the source IP address, destination IP address, and port numbers
    • If the ELB is already behind a Proxy with the Proxy protocol enabled, enabling the Proxy Protocol on ELB would add the header twice

Cross-Zone Load Balancing

  • By default, the load balancer distributes incoming requests evenly across its enabled Availability Zones for e.g. If AZ-a has 5 instances and AZ-b has 2 instances, the load will still be distributed 50% across each of the AZs
  • Enabling Cross-Zone load balancing allows the ELB to distribute incoming requests evenly across all the back-end instances, regardless of the AZ
  • Elastic Load Balancing creates a load balancer node in the AZ. By default, each load balancer node distributes traffic across the registered targets in its AZ only. If you enable cross-zone load balancing, each load balancer node distributes traffic across the registered targets in all enabled AZs.
  • Cross-zone load balancer reduces the need to maintain equivalent numbers of back-end instances in each AZ and improves the application’s ability to handle the loss of one or more back-end instances.
  • It is still recommended to maintain approximately equivalent numbers of instances in each Availability Zone for higher fault tolerance.
  • With cross-zone load balancing, each load balancer node distributes traffic across the registered targets in all enabled Availability Zones.
  • ALB -> Cross Zone load balancing is enabled by default and free
  • CLB -> Cross Zone load balancing is disabled, by default, and can be enabled and free
  • NLB -> Cross Zone load balancing is disabled, by default, and can be enabled but charged for inter-az data transfer.

Connection Draining (Deregistration Delay)

  • By default, if a registered EC2 instance with the ELB is deregistered or becomes unhealthy, the load balancer immediately closes the connection
  • Connection draining can help the load balancer to complete the in-flight requests made while keeping the existing connections open, and preventing any new requests from being sent to the instances that are de-registering or unhealthy.
  • Connection draining helps perform maintenance such as deploying software upgrades or replacing back-end instances without affecting customers’ experience
  • Connection draining allows you to specify a maximum time (between 1 and 3,600 seconds and default 300 seconds) to keep the connections alive before reporting the instance as de-registered. The maximum timeout limit does not apply to connections to unhealthy instances.
  • If the instances are part of an Auto Scaling group and connection draining is enabled for your load balancer, Auto Scaling waits for the in-flight requests to complete, or for the maximum timeout to expire, before terminating instances due to a scaling event or health check replacement.

Sticky Sessions (Session Affinity)

  • ELB can be configured to use Sticky Session feature (also called session affinity) which enables it to bind a user’s session to an instance and ensures all requests are sent to the same instance.
  • Stickiness remains for a period of time which can be controlled by the application’s session cookie if one exists, or through a cookie, named AWSELB , created through Elastic Load balancer.
  • Sticky sessions for CLB and ALB are disabled, by default.
  • NLB does not support sticky sessions

Requirements

  • An HTTP/HTTPS load balancer.
  • SSL traffic should be terminated on the ELB.
  • ELB does session stickiness on an HTTP/HTTPS listener by utilizing an HTTP cookie. ELB has no visibility into the HTTP headers if the SSL traffic is not terminated on the ELB and is terminated on the back-end instance.
  • At least one healthy instance in each Availability Zone.

Duration-Based Session Stickiness

  • Duration-Based Session Stickiness is maintained by ELB using a special cookie created to track the instance for each request to each listener.
  • When the load balancer receives a request,
    • it first checks to see if this cookie is present in the request. If so, the request is sent to the instance specified in the cookie.
    • If there is no cookie, the ELB chooses an instance based on the existing load balancing algorithm and a cookie is inserted into the response for binding subsequent requests from the same user to that instance.
  • Stickiness policy configuration defines a cookie expiration, which establishes the duration of validity for each cookie.
  • Cookie is automatically updated after its duration expires.

Application-Controlled Session Stickiness

  • Load balancer uses a special cookie only to associate the session with the instance that handled the initial request, but follows the lifetime of the application cookie specified in the policy configuration.
  • Load balancer only inserts a new stickiness cookie if the application response includes a new application cookie. The load balancer stickiness cookie does not update with each request.
  • If the application cookie is explicitly removed or expires, the session stops being sticky until a new application cookie is issued.
  • If an instance fails or becomes unhealthy, the load balancer stops routing request to that instance, instead chooses a new healthy instance based on the existing load balancing algorithm.
  • The load balancer treats the session as now “stuck” to the new healthy instance, and continues routing requests to that instance even if the failed instance comes back.

Load Balancer Deletion

  • Deleting a load balancer does not affect the instances registered with the load balancer and they would continue to run

ELB with Autoscaling

Refer Blog Post @ ELB with Autoscaling

AWS Certification Exam Practice Questions

  • Questions are collected from Internet and the answers are marked as per my knowledge and understanding (which might differ with yours).
  • AWS services are updated everyday and both the answers and questions might be outdated soon, so research accordingly.
  • AWS exam questions are not updated to keep up the pace with AWS updates, so even if the underlying feature has changed the question might not be updated
  • Open to further feedback, discussion and correction.
  1. A user has configured an HTTPS listener on an ELB. The user has not configured any security policy which can help to negotiate SSL between the client and ELB. What will ELB do in this scenario?
    1. By default ELB will select the first version of the security policy
    2. By default ELB will select the latest version of the policy
    3. ELB creation will fail without a security policy
    4. It is not required to have a security policy since SSL is already installed
  2. A user has configured ELB with SSL using a security policy for secure negotiation between the client and load balancer. The ELB security policy supports various ciphers. Which of the below mentioned options helps identify the matching cipher at the client side to the ELB cipher list when client is requesting ELB DNS over SSL
    1. Cipher Protocol
    2. Client Configuration Preference
    3. Server Order Preference
    4. Load Balancer Preference
  3. A user has configured ELB with SSL using a security policy for secure negotiation between the client and load balancer. Which of the below mentioned security policies is supported by ELB?
    1. Dynamic Security Policy
    2. All the other options
    3. Predefined Security Policy
    4. Default Security Policy
  4. A user has configured ELB with SSL using a security policy for secure negotiation between the client and load balancer. Which of the below mentioned SSL protocols is not supported by the security policy?
    1. TLS 1.3
    2. TLS 1.2
    3. SSL 2.0
    4. SSL 3.0
  5. A user has configured ELB with a TCP listener at ELB as well as on the back-end instances. The user wants to enable a proxy protocol to capture the source and destination IP information in the header. Which of the below mentioned statements helps the user understand a proxy protocol with TCP configuration?
    1. If the end user is requesting behind a proxy server then the user should not enable a proxy protocol on ELB
    2. ELB does not support a proxy protocol when it is listening on both the load balancer and the back-end instances
    3. Whether the end user is requesting from a proxy server or directly, it does not make a difference for the proxy protocol
    4. If the end user is requesting behind the proxy then the user should add the “isproxy” flag to the ELB Configuration
  6. A user has enabled session stickiness with ELB. The user does not want ELB to manage the cookie; instead he wants the application to manage the cookie. What will happen when the server instance, which is bound to a cookie, crashes?
    1. The response will have a cookie but stickiness will be deleted
    2. The session will not be sticky until a new cookie is inserted
    3. ELB will throw an error due to cookie unavailability
    4. The session will be sticky and ELB will route requests to another server as ELB keeps replicating the Cookie
  7. A user has created an ELB with Auto Scaling. Which of the below mentioned offerings from ELB helps the user to stop sending new requests traffic from the load balancer to the EC2 instance when the instance is being deregistered while continuing in-flight requests?
    1. ELB sticky session
    2. ELB deregistration check
    3. ELB connection draining
    4. ELB auto registration Off
  8. When using an Elastic Load Balancer to serve traffic to web servers, which one of the following is true?
    1. Web servers must be publicly accessible
    2. The same security group must be applied to both the ELB and EC2 instances
    3. ELB and EC2 instance must be in the same subnet
    4. ELB and EC2 instances must be in the same VPC
  9. A user has configured Elastic Load Balancing by enabling a Secure Socket Layer (SSL) negotiation configuration known as a Security Policy. Which of the below mentioned options is not part of this secure policy while negotiating the SSL connection between the user and the client?
    1. SSL Protocols
    2. Client Order Preference
    3. SSL Ciphers
    4. Server Order Preference
  10. A user has created an ELB with the availability zone us-east-1. The user wants to add more zones to ELB to achieve High Availability. How can the user add more zones to the existing ELB?
    1. It is not possible to add more zones to the existing ELB
    2. Only option is to launch instances in different zones and add to ELB
    3. The user should stop the ELB and add zones and instances as required
    4. The user can add zones on the fly from the AWS console
  11. A user has launched an ELB which has 5 instances registered with it. The user deletes the ELB by mistake. What will happen to the instances?
    1. ELB will ask the user whether to delete the instances or not
    2. Instances will be terminated
    3. ELB cannot be deleted if it has running instances registered with it
    4. Instances will keep running
  12. A Sys-admin has created a shopping cart application and hosted it on EC2. The EC2 instances are running behind ELB. The admin wants to ensure that the end user request will always go to the EC2 instance where the user session has been created. How can the admin configure this?
    1. Enable ELB cross zone load balancing
    2. Enable ELB cookie setup
    3. Enable ELB sticky session
    4. Enable ELB connection draining
  13. A user has setup connection draining with ELB to allow in-flight requests to continue while the instance is being deregistered through Auto Scaling. If the user has not specified the draining time, how long will ELB allow inflight requests traffic to continue?
    1. 600 seconds
    2. 3600 seconds
    3. 300 seconds
    4. 0 seconds
  14. A customer has a web application that uses cookie Based sessions to track logged in users. It is deployed on AWS using ELB and Auto Scaling. The customer observes that when load increases Auto Scaling launches new Instances but the load on the existing Instances does not decrease, causing all existing users to have a sluggish experience. Which two answer choices independently describe a behavior that could be the cause of the sluggish user experience?
    1. ELB’s normal behavior sends requests from the same user to the same backend instance (its not by default)
    2. ELB’s behavior when sticky sessions are enabled causes ELB to send requests in the same session to the same backend 
    3. A faulty browser is not honoring the TTL of the ELB DNS name (DNS TTL would only impact the ELB instances if scaled and not the EC2 instances to which the traffic is routed)
    4. The web application uses long polling such as comet or websockets. Thereby keeping a connection open to a web server tor a long time
  15. A customer has an online store that uses the cookie-based sessions to track logged-in customers. It is deployed on AWS using ELB and autoscaling. When the load increases, Auto scaling automatically launches new web servers, but the load on the web servers do not decrease. This causes the customers a poor experience. What could be causing the issue ?
    1. ELB DNS records Time to Live is set too high (DNS TTL would only impact the ELB instances if scaled and not the EC2 instances to which the traffic is routed)
    2. ELB is configured to send requests with previously established sessions
    3. Website uses CloudFront which is keeping sessions alive
    4. New Instances are not being added to the ELB during the Auto Scaling cool down period
  16. You are designing a multi-platform web application for AWS. The application will run on EC2 instances and will be accessed from PCs, tablets and smart phones. Supported accessing platforms are Windows, MACOS, IOS and Android. Separate sticky session and SSL certificate setups are required for different platform types. Which of the following describes the most cost effective and performance efficient architecture setup?
    1. Setup a hybrid architecture to handle session state and SSL certificates on-prem and separate EC2 Instance groups running web applications for different platform types running in a VPC.
    2. Set up one ELB for all platforms to distribute load among multiple instance under it. Each EC2 instance implements all functionality for a particular platform.
    3. Set up two ELBs. The first ELB handles SSL certificates for all platforms and the second ELB handles session stickiness for all platforms for each ELB run separate EC2 instance groups to handle the web application for each platform.
    4. Assign multiple ELBs to an EC2 instance or group of EC2 instances running the common components of the web application, one ELB for each platform type. Session stickiness and SSL termination are done at the ELBs. (Session stickiness requires HTTPS listener with SSL termination on the ELB and ELB does not support multiple SSL certs so one is required for each cert)
  17. You are migrating a legacy client-server application to AWS. The application responds to a specific DNS domain (e.g. www.example.com) and has a 2-tier architecture, with multiple application servers and a database server. Remote clients use TCP to connect to the application servers. The application servers need to know the IP address of the clients in order to function properly and are currently taking that information from the TCP socket. A Multi-AZ RDS MySQL instance will be used for the database. During the migration you can change the application code but you have to file a change request. How would you implement the architecture on AWS in order to maximize scalability and high availability?
    1. File a change request to implement Proxy Protocol support In the application. Use an ELB with a TCP Listener and Proxy Protocol enabled to distribute load on two application servers in different AZs. (ELB with TCP listener and proxy protocol will allow IP to be passed )
    2. File a change request to Implement Cross-Zone support in the application. Use an ELB with a TCP Listener and Cross-Zone Load Balancing enabled, two application servers in different AZs.
    3. File a change request to implement Latency Based Routing support in the application. Use Route 53 with Latency Based Routing enabled to distribute load on two application servers in different AZs.
    4. File a change request to implement Alias Resource support in the application Use Route 53 Alias Resource Record to distribute load on two application servers in different AZs.
  18. A user has created an ELB with three instances. How many security groups will ELB create by default?
    1. 3
    2. 5
    3. 2 (One for ELB to allow inbound and Outbound to listener and health check port of instances and One for the Instances to allow inbound from ELB)
    4. 1
  19. You have a web-style application with a stateless but CPU and memory-intensive web tier running on a cc2 8xlarge EC2 instance inside of a VPC The instance when under load is having problems returning requests within the SLA as defined by your business The application maintains its state in a DynamoDB table, but the data tier is properly provisioned and responses are consistently fast. How can you best resolve the issue of the application responses not meeting your SLA?
    1. Add another cc2 8xlarge application instance, and put both behind an Elastic Load Balancer
    2. Move the cc2 8xlarge to the same Availability Zone as the DynamoDB table (Does not improve the response time and performance)
    3. Cache the database responses in ElastiCache for more rapid access (Data tier is responding fast)
    4. Move the database from DynamoDB to RDS MySQL in scale-out read-replica configuration (Data tier is responding fast)
  20. An organization has configured a VPC with an Internet Gateway (IGW). pairs of public and private subnets (each with one subnet per Availability Zone), and an Elastic Load Balancer (ELB) configured to use the public subnets. The applications web tier leverages the ELB, Auto Scaling and a Multi-AZ RDS database instance. The organization would like to eliminate any potential single points of failure in this design. What step should you take to achieve this organization’s objective?
    1. Nothing, there are no single points of failure in this architecture.
    2. Create and attach a second IGW to provide redundant internet connectivity. (VPC can be attached only 1 IGW)
    3. Create and configure a second Elastic Load Balancer to provide a redundant load balancer. (ELB scales by itself with multiple availability zones configured with it)
    4. Create a second multi-AZ RDS instance in another Availability Zone and configure replication to provide a redundant database. (Multi AZ requires 2 different AZ for setup and already has a standby)
  21. Your application currently leverages AWS Auto Scaling to grow and shrink as load Increases/ decreases and has been performing well. Your marketing team expects a steady ramp up in traffic to follow an upcoming campaign that will result in a 20x growth in traffic over 4 weeks. Your forecast for the approximate number of Amazon EC2 instances necessary to meet the peak demand is 175. What should you do to avoid potential service disruptions during the ramp up in traffic?
    1. Ensure that you have pre-allocated 175 Elastic IP addresses so that each server will be able to obtain one as it launches (max limit 5 EIP and a service request needs to be submitted)
    2. Check the service limits in Trusted Advisor and adjust as necessary so the forecasted count remains within limits.
    3. Change your Auto Scaling configuration to set a desired capacity of 175 prior to the launch of the marketing campaign (Will cause 175 instances to be launched and running but not gradually scale)
    4. Pre-warm your Elastic Load Balancer to match the requests per second anticipated during peak demand (Does not need pre warming as the load is increasing steadily)
  22. Which of the following features ensures even distribution of traffic to Amazon EC2 instances in multiple Availability Zones registered with a load balancer?
    1. Elastic Load Balancing request routing
    2. An Amazon Route 53 weighted routing policy (does not control traffic to EC2 instance)
    3. Elastic Load Balancing cross-zone load balancing
    4. An Amazon Route 53 latency routing policy (does not control traffic to EC2 instance)
  23. Your web application front end consists of multiple EC2 instances behind an Elastic Load Balancer. You configured ELB to perform health checks on these EC2 instances, if an instance fails to pass health checks, which statement will be true?
    1. The instance gets terminated automatically by the ELB (it is done by Autoscaling)
    2. The instance gets quarantined by the ELB for root cause analysis.
    3. The instance is replaced automatically by the ELB. (it is done by Autoscaling)
    4. The ELB stops sending traffic to the instance that failed its health check
  24. You have a web application running on six Amazon EC2 instances, consuming about 45% of resources on each instance. You are using auto-scaling to make sure that six instances are running at all times. The number of requests this application processes is consistent and does not experience spikes. The application is critical to your business and you want high availability at all times. You want the load to be distributed evenly between all instances. You also want to use the same Amazon Machine Image (AMI) for all instances. Which of the following architectural choices should you make?
    1. Deploy 6 EC2 instances in one availability zone and use Amazon Elastic Load Balancer. (Single AZ will not provide High Availability)
    2. Deploy 3 EC2 instances in one region and 3 in another region and use Amazon Elastic Load Balancer. (Different region, AMI would not be available unless copied)
    3. Deploy 3 EC2 instances in one availability zone and 3 in another availability zone and use Amazon Elastic Load Balancer.
    4. Deploy 2 EC2 instances in three regions and use Amazon Elastic Load Balancer. (Different region, AMI would not be available unless copied)
  25. You are designing an SSL/TLS solution that requires HTTPS clients to be authenticated by the Web server using client certificate authentication. The solution must be resilient. Which of the following options would you consider for configuring the web server infrastructure? (Choose 2 answers)
    1. Configure ELB with TCP listeners on TCP/443. And place the Web servers behind it. (terminate SSL on the instance using client-side certificate)
    2. Configure your Web servers with EIPs. Place the Web servers in a Route53 Record Set and configure health checks against all Web servers. (Remove ELB and use Web Servers directly with Route 53)
    3. Configure ELB with HTTPS listeners, and place the Web servers behind it. (ELB with HTTPs does not support Client-Side certificates)
    4. Configure your web servers as the origins for a CloudFront distribution. Use custom SSL certificates on your CloudFront distribution (CloudFront does not Client-Side ssl certificates)
  26. You are designing an application that contains protected health information. Security and compliance requirements for your application mandate that all protected health information in the application use encryption at rest and in transit. The application uses a three-tier architecture where data flows through the load balancer and is stored on Amazon EBS volumes for processing, and the results are stored in Amazon S3 using the AWS SDK. Which of the following two options satisfy the security requirements? Choose 2 answers
    1. Use SSL termination on the load balancer, Amazon EBS encryption on Amazon EC2 instances, and Amazon S3 with server-side encryption. (connection between ELB and EC2 not encrypted)
    2. Use SSL termination with a SAN SSL certificate on the load balancer, Amazon EC2 with all Amazon EBS volumes using Amazon EBS encryption, and Amazon S3 with server-side encryption with customer-managed keys.
    3. Use TCP load balancing on the load balancer, SSL termination on the Amazon EC2 instances, OS-level disk encryption on the Amazon EBS volumes, and Amazon S3 with server-side encryption.
    4. Use TCP load balancing on the load balancer, SSL termination on the Amazon EC2 instances, and Amazon S3 with server-side encryption. (Does not mention EBS encryption)
    5. Use SSL termination on the load balancer, an SSL listener on the Amazon EC2 instances, Amazon EBS encryption on EBS volumes containing PHI, and Amazon S3 with server-side encryption.
  27. A startup deploys its photo-sharing site in a VPC. An elastic load balancer distributes web traffic across two subnets. The load balancer session stickiness is configured to use the AWS-generated session cookie, with a session TTL of 5 minutes. The web server Auto Scaling group is configured as min-size=4, max-size=4. The startup is preparing for a public launch, by running load-testing software installed on a single Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instance running in us-west-2a. After 60 minutes of load-testing, the web server logs show the following:WEBSERVER LOGS | # of HTTP requests from load-tester | # of HTTP requests from private beta users || webserver #1 (subnet in us-west-2a): | 19,210 | 434 || webserver #2 (subnet in us-west-2a): | 21,790 | 490 || webserver #3 (subnet in us-west-2b): | 0 | 410 || webserver #4 (subnet in us-west-2b): | 0 | 428 |Which recommendations can help ensure that load-testing HTTP requests are evenly distributed across the four web servers? Choose 2 answers
    1. Launch and run the load-tester Amazon EC2 instance from us-east-1 instead.
    2. Configure Elastic Load Balancing session stickiness to use the app-specific session cookie.
    3. Re-configure the load-testing software to re-resolve DNS for each web request. (Refer link)
    4. Configure Elastic Load Balancing and Auto Scaling to distribute across us-west-2a and us-west-2b.
    5. Use a third-party load-testing service which offers globally distributed test clients. (Refer link)
  28. To serve Web traffic for a popular product your chief financial officer and IT director have purchased 10 m1.large heavy utilization Reserved Instances (RIs) evenly spread across two availability zones: Route 53 is used to deliver the traffic to an Elastic Load Balancer (ELB). After several months, the product grows even more popular and you need additional capacity As a result, your company purchases two c3.2xlarge medium utilization RIs You register the two c3.2xlarge instances with your ELB and quickly find that the ml large instances are at 100% of capacity and the c3.2xlarge instances have significant capacity that’s unused Which option is the most cost effective and uses EC2 capacity most effectively?
    1. Use a separate ELB for each instance type and distribute load to ELBs with Route 53 weighted round robin
    2. Configure Autoscaling group and Launch Configuration with ELB to add up to 10 more on-demand mi large instances when triggered by CloudWatch shut off c3.2xlarge instances (increase cost as you still pay for the RI)
    3. Route traffic to EC2 m1.large and c3.2xlarge instances directly using Route 53 latency based routing and health checks shut off ELB (will not still use the capacity effectively)
    4. Configure ELB with two c3.2xlarge Instances and use on-demand Autoscailng group for up to two additional c3.2xlarge instances Shut on m1.large instances(Increases cost, as you still pay for the 10 m1.large RI)
  29. Which header received at the EC2 instance identifies the port used by the client while requesting ELB?
    1. X-Forwarded-Proto
    2. X-Requested-Proto
    3. X-Forwarded-Port
    4. X-Requested-Port
  30. A user has configured ELB with two instances running in separate AZs of the same region? Which of the below mentioned statements is true?
    1. Multi AZ instances will provide HA with ELB (ELB provides HA to route traffic to healthy instances only it does not provide scalability)
    2. Multi AZ instances are not possible with a single ELB
    3. Multi AZ instances will provide scalability with ELB
    4. The user can achieve both HA and scalability with ELB
  31. A user is configuring the HTTPS protocol on a front end ELB and the SSL protocol for the back-end listener in ELB. What will ELB do?
    1. It will allow you to create the configuration, but the instance will not pass the health check
    2. Receives requests on HTTPS and sends it to the back end instance on SSL
    3. It will not allow you to create this configuration (Will give error “Load Balancer protocol is an application layer protocol, but instance protocol is not. Both the Load Balancer protocol and the instance protocol should be at the same layer. Please fix.”)
    4. It will allow you to create the configuration, but ELB will not work as expected
  32. An ELB is diverting traffic across 5 instances. One of the instances was unhealthy only for 20 minutes. What will happen after 20 minutes when the instance becomes healthy?
    1. ELB will never divert traffic back to the same instance
    2. ELB will not automatically send traffic to the same instance. However, the user can configure to start sending traffic to the same instance
    3. ELB starts sending traffic to the instance once it is healthy
    4. ELB terminates the instance once it is unhealthy. Thus, the instance cannot be healthy after 10 minutes
  33. A user has hosted a website on AWS and uses ELB to load balance the multiple instances. The user application does not have any cookie management. How can the user bind the session of the requestor with a particular instance?
    1. Bind the IP address with a sticky cookie
    2. Create a cookie at the application level to set at ELB
    3. Use session synchronization with ELB
    4. Let ELB generate a cookie for a specified duration
  34. A user has configured a website and launched it using the Apache web server on port 80. The user is using ELB with the EC2 instances for Load Balancing. What should the user do to ensure that the EC2 instances accept requests only from ELB?
    1. Open the port for an ELB static IP in the EC2 security group
    2. Configure the security group of EC2, which allows access to the ELB source security group
    3. Configure the EC2 instance so that it only listens on the ELB port
    4. Configure the security group of EC2, which allows access only to the ELB listener
  35. AWS Elastic Load Balancer supports SSL termination.
    1. For specific availability zones only
    2. False
    3. For specific regions only
    4. For all regions
  36. User has launched five instances with ELB. How can the user add the sixth EC2 instance to ELB?
    1. The user can add the sixth instance on the fly.
    2. The user must stop the ELB and add the sixth instance.
    3. The user can add the instance and change the ELB config file.
    4. The ELB can only have a maximum of five instances.

References

AWS Classic Load Balancer vs Application Load Balancer vs Network Load Balancer

AWS Classic Load Balancer vs Application Load Balancer vs Network Load Balancer

📌 Post Updated: June 2026 — Added Gateway Load Balancer (GWLB), NLB Security Groups support, ALB Mutual TLS, NLB QUIC protocol, ALB JWT verification, ALB Target Optimizer, LCU Reservation, Post-Quantum TLS, and updated EC2-Classic retirement status.

  • Elastic Load Balancing supports four types of load balancers:
    • Classic Load Balancer – CLB (Previous Generation)
    • Application Load Balancer – ALB
    • Network Load Balancer – NLB
    • Gateway Load Balancer – GWLB
  • While there is some overlap in the features, AWS does not maintain feature parity between the different types of load balancers.

⚠️ Classic Load Balancer – Previous Generation

Classic Load Balancer is the previous generation load balancer. AWS recommends using Application Load Balancer for Layer 7 and Network Load Balancer for Layer 4. CLB was originally designed for the EC2-Classic network, which was fully retired in August 2023. While CLB continues to function in VPC, no new features are being added to it.

Migration: Use the AWS Migration Wizard to migrate existing CLBs to ALB or NLB. See Migrate your Classic Load Balancer.

CLB vs ALB vs NLB General

Usage Patterns

  • Classic Load Balancer (Previous Generation)
    • provides basic load balancing across multiple EC2 instances and operates at both the request level and connection level.
    • is intended for applications that were built within the EC2-Classic network. EC2-Classic was fully retired in August 2023.
    • is ideal for simple load balancing of traffic across multiple EC2 instances.
    • AWS recommends migrating to ALB or NLB for all new workloads.
  • Application Load Balancer
    • is ideal for microservices or container-based architectures where there is a need to route traffic to multiple services or load balance across multiple ports on the same EC2 instance.
    • operates at the request level (layer 7), routing traffic to targets – EC2 instances, containers, IP addresses, and Lambda functions based on the content of the request.
    • is ideal for advanced load balancing of HTTP and HTTPS traffic, and provides advanced request routing targeted at delivery of modern application architectures, including microservices and container-based applications.
    • simplifies and improves the security of the application, by ensuring that the latest SSL/TLS ciphers and protocols are used at all times.
    • supports Mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication to verify client certificate-based identities.
    • supports native JWT (JSON Web Token) verification for secure service-to-service authentication.
  • Network Load Balancer
    • operates at the connection level (Layer 4), routing connections to targets – EC2 instances, microservices, and containers – within VPC based on IP protocol data.
    • is ideal for load balancing of TCP, UDP, TLS, and QUIC traffic.
    • is capable of handling millions of requests per second while maintaining ultra-low latencies.
    • is optimized to handle sudden and volatile traffic patterns while using a single static IP address per AZ
    • is integrated with other popular AWS services such as Auto Scaling, ECS, CloudFormation, and AWS Certificate Manager (ACM).
    • now supports security groups (since August 2023) for centralized access control.
    • supports QUIC protocol in passthrough mode (since November 2025) for low-latency mobile and real-time applications.
  • Gateway Load Balancer
    • operates at Layer 3 (network layer), providing a transparent network gateway and distributing traffic to virtual appliances.
    • is ideal for deploying, scaling, and managing third-party virtual appliances such as firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS), and deep packet inspection systems.
    • combines a transparent network gateway (single entry and exit point for all traffic) with load balancing of virtual appliances.
    • uses the GENEVE protocol on port 6081 to exchange traffic with registered virtual appliance instances.
    • maintains flow stickiness using 5-tuple (default), 3-tuple, or 2-tuple.
  • AWS recommends using Application Load Balancer for Layer 7 and Network Load Balancer for Layer 4 when using VPC.

AWS ELB Classic Load Balancer vs Application Load Balancer
Supported Protocols

  • Classic ELB operates at layer 4 and supports HTTP, HTTPS, TCP, SSL
  • ALB operates at layer 7 and supports HTTP, HTTPS, HTTP/2, gRPC, WebSockets
  • NLB operates at the connection level (Layer 4) and supports TCP, UDP, TLS, QUIC, TCP_QUIC
  • GWLB operates at Layer 3 and listens for all IP packets across all ports

Load Balancing to Multiple Ports on the same instance

  • ALB, NLB, and GWLB support Load Balancing to multiple ports on the same instance
  • CLB does not support load balancing to multiple ports on the same instance

Host-based Routing & Path-based Routing

  • Host-based routing use host conditions to define rules that forward requests to different target groups based on the hostname in the host header. This enables ALB to support multiple domains using a single load balancer.
  • Path-based routing use path conditions to define rules that forward requests to different target groups based on the URL in the request. Each path condition has one path pattern. If the URL in a request matches the path pattern in a listener rule exactly, the request is routed using that rule.
  • Only ALB supports Host-based & Path-based routing.

URL and Host Header Rewrite (ALB – New 2025)

  • ALB now supports URL and Host Header rewrite capabilities (October 2025).
  • Enables modification of request URLs and Host Headers using regex-based pattern matching before routing requests to targets.
  • Useful for URL normalization, path rewriting, and host header transformation without application code changes.
  • Only ALB supports URL and Host Header Rewrite.

CLB vs ALB vs NLB Common configurations and Features

Slow Start

  • By default, a target starts to receive its full share of requests as soon as it is registered with a target group and passes an initial health check.
  • Using slow start mode gives targets time to warm up before the load balancer sends them a full share of requests.
  • Only ALB supports slow start mode

Target Optimizer (ALB – New 2025)

  • ALB Target Optimizer (November 2025) allows you to enforce a maximum number of concurrent requests on a target.
  • Uses an agent installed on each target that tracks concurrent requests and signals the ALB when capacity is available.
  • Enables high-efficiency load balanced applications while maintaining low latency and high availability.
  • Returns 503 errors during overload rather than overwhelming targets.
  • Only ALB supports Target Optimizer.

Static IP and Elastic IP Address

  • NLB automatically provides a static IP per AZ (subnet) that can be used by applications as the front-end IP of the load balancer.
  • NLB also allows the option to assign an Elastic IP per AZ (subnet) thereby providing your own fixed IP.
  • Classic ELB, ALB, and GWLB do not support Static and Elastic IP address

Connection Draining OR Deregistration Delay

  • Connection draining enables the load balancer to complete in-flight requests made to instances that are de-registering or unhealthy.
  • All Load Balancer types (CLB, ALB, NLB, GWLB) support connection draining/deregistration delay.

Idle Connection Timeout

  • Idle Connection Timeout helps specify a time period, which ELB uses to close the connection if no data has been sent or received by the time that the idle timeout period elapses
  • Can be configured for CLB & ALB (default 60 seconds)
  • Cannot be configured for NLB (350 secs for TCP, 120 secs for UDP)
  • GWLB supports configurable TCP idle timeout (60 to 6000 seconds, since September 2024)
  • It is recommended to enable HTTP keep-alive in the web server settings for the EC2 instances, thus making the ELB reuse the backend connections until the keep-alive timeout expires.

PrivateLink Support

  • CLB and ALB do not support PrivateLink
  • NLB supports PrivateLink (TCP, TLS, UDP)
  • GWLB supports PrivateLink via Gateway Load Balancer Endpoints (GWLBE)

Zonal Isolation

  • NLB and GWLB support Zonal Isolation which supports application architectures in a single zone. It automatically fails over to other healthy AZs, if something fails in an AZ
  • CLB and ALB do not support Zonal Isolation.
  • NLB supports Zonal DNS Affinity (since October 2023), allowing clients to resolve the load balancer DNS to an IP in their same AZ.

Deletion Protection

  • ALB, NLB, and GWLB support Deletion Protection, wherein a load balancer can’t be deleted if deletion protection is enabled
  • CLB does not support deletion protection.

Preserve Source IP address

  • As the ELB intercepts the traffic between the client and the back-end servers, the back-end server does not know the IP address, Protocol, and the Port used between the Client and the Load balancer.
  • Classic ELB (HTTP/HTTPS) and ALB do not preserve the client-side source IP. It needs to be retrieved using X-Forward-XXX.
    • X-Forwarded-For request header to help back-end servers identify the IP address of a client when you use an HTTP or HTTPS load balancer.
    • X-Forwarded-Proto request header to help back-end servers identify the protocol (HTTP/S) that a client used to connect to the server
    • X-Forwarded-Port request header to help back-end servers identify the port that an HTTP or HTTPS load balancer uses to connect to the client.
  • CLB (SSL/TLS) uses Proxy Protocol Version 1 and NLB uses Proxy Protocol Version 2 to provide the information.
  • NLB preserves the client-side source IP or needs Proxy Protocol allowing the back-end to see the IP address of the client.
    • If targets are registered by instance ID or ECS tasks, the source IP addresses of the clients are preserved and provided to the applications.
    • If targets are registered by IP address
      • for TCP & TLS, the source IP addresses are the private IP addresses of the load balancer nodes. Use Proxy Protocol.
      • for UDP & TCP_UDP, it is enabled by default and the source IP addresses of the clients are preserved.
  • GWLB preserves the source IP address as it operates as a transparent bump-in-the-wire.

Health Checks

  • All Load Balancer types support Health checks to determine if the instance is healthy or unhealthy
  • ALB provides health check improvements that allow detailed error codes from 200-399 to be configured
  • ALB supports HTTP, HTTPS, and gRPC health checks
  • NLB and GWLB support TCP, HTTP, and HTTPS health checks
  • CLB supports TCP, SSL/TLS, HTTP, and HTTPS health checks

Security Groups

  • ALB, NLB, and CLB support security groups
  • NLB added security group support in August 2023, enabling centralized access control and inbound rule enforcement
  • GWLB does not support security groups
  • Note: NLB security groups must be associated at creation time; they cannot be added to an existing NLB that was created without them.

Supported Platforms

  • Classic ELB supports both EC2-Classic and EC2-VPC — EC2-Classic was fully retired in August 2023. All load balancers now operate in VPC only.
  • ALB, NLB, and GWLB support only EC2-VPC.
  • CLB now effectively operates only in VPC (EC2-Classic no longer exists).

WebSockets

  • CLB does not support WebSockets
  • ALB, NLB, and GWLB support WebSockets

Cross-zone Load Balancing

  • By default, Load Balancer will distribute requests evenly across its enabled AZs, irrespective of the instances it hosts.
  • Cross-zone Load Balancing help distribute incoming requests evenly across all instances in its enabled AZs.
  • CLB → Cross Zone load balancing is disabled, by default, and can be enabled and free of charge.
  • ALB → Cross Zone load balancing is always enabled at the load balancer level, but can be turned off at the target group level (since November 2022). Free of charge.
  • NLB → Cross Zone load balancing is disabled, by default, and can be enabled but is charged for inter-az data transfer.
  • GWLB → Cross Zone load balancing is disabled, by default, and can be enabled.
  • Zonal Shift & Autoshift: Both ALB and NLB (with cross-zone enabled) now support zonal shift and zonal autoshift (2024) to move traffic away from an impaired AZ.

Sticky Sessions (Cookies)

  • Sticky Sessions (Session Affinity) enables the load balancer to bind a user’s session to a specific instance, which ensures that all requests from the user during the session are sent to the same instance
  • CLB, ALB, and NLB support sticky sessions to maintain session affinity
  • CLB and ALB maintain session stickiness using cookies.
  • NLB supports sticky sessions using a built-in 5-tuple hash table to maintain stickiness across backend servers.
  • NLB idle timeout for TCP connections is 350 seconds. Once the timeout is reached or the session is terminated, the NLB will forget the stickiness and incoming packets will be considered as a new flow and could be load balanced to a new target.
  • NLB QUIC protocol uses QUIC Connection IDs for session stickiness, which is resilient to client IP/NAT changes.

CLB vs ALB vs NLB Security

SSL Termination/Offloading

  • SSL Termination helps decrypt requests from clients before sending them to targets and hence reducing the load. SSL certificate must be installed on the load balancer.
  • CLB, ALB, and NLB support SSL Termination.
  • GWLB does not support SSL offloading (operates at Layer 3).
  • ALB and NLB now support Post-Quantum Key Exchange for TLS (November 2025), using hybrid post-quantum key agreement with ML-KEM algorithm for quantum-resistant encryption.

Mutual TLS (mTLS) Authentication (ALB – New 2023)

  • Mutual TLS extends standard TLS by requiring clients to present X.509 certificates for authentication.
  • ALB can authenticate client certificates from third-party Certificate Authorities or AWS Private Certificate Authority (PCA).
  • Supports certificate revocation checks to restrict access for compromised certificates.
  • Offloads client authentication to the load balancer, eliminating the need for custom authentication in applications.
  • Only ALB supports Mutual TLS authentication.

JWT Verification (ALB – New 2025)

  • ALB now supports native JSON Web Token (JWT) verification (November 2025) for secure service-to-service (S2S) or machine-to-machine (M2M) communications.
  • Validates token signatures, expiration times, and claims without requiring application code changes.
  • Useful for OAuth 2.0 client credentials flow.
  • Only ALB supports native JWT verification.

Server Name Indication

  • CLB only supports a single certificate and does not support SNI
  • ALB and NLB support multiple certificates and use SNI to serve multiple secure websites using a single TLS listener.
    • If the hostname provided by a client matches a single certificate in the certificate list, the load balancer selects this certificate.
    • If a hostname provided by a client matches multiple certificates in the certificate list, the load balancer selects the best certificate that the client can support.

Back-end Server Authentication

  • Back-end Server Authentication enables authentication of the instances.
  • Load balancer communicates with an instance only if the public key that the instance presents to the load balancer matches a public key in the authentication policy for the load balancer.
  • Classic Load Balancer supports Back-end Server Authentication
  • ALB does not support Back-end Server Authentication

Capacity Unit Reservation (New 2024)

  • ALB and NLB support Load Balancer Capacity Unit (LCU) Reservation (November 2024).
  • Allows proactively setting a minimum capacity for the load balancer to prepare for planned traffic spikes.
  • Complements existing auto-scaling, useful for product launches, sales events, or traffic migrations.
  • GWLB added LCU Reservation support in April 2025.
  • ALB, NLB, and GWLB support LCU Reservation.
  • CLB does not support LCU Reservation.

Weighted Target Groups (NLB – New 2025)

  • NLB now supports weighted target groups (November 2025).
  • Allows distributing traffic across multiple target groups with configurable static weights.
  • Enables blue/green and canary deployment strategies with zero downtime without needing multiple load balancers.
  • ALB has long supported weighted target groups via listener rules; NLB now supports this natively.

CloudWatch Metrics

  • All Load Balancer types integrate with CloudWatch to provide metrics, with ALB providing additional metrics
  • ALB and CLB report request counts, error counts, error types, and request latency
  • NLB and GWLB report Active Flow Count, New Flow Count, and Processed Bytes

Access Logs

  • Access logs capture detailed information about requests sent to the load balancer. Each log contains information such as request received time, client’s IP address, latencies, request paths, and server responses
  • All Load Balancer types provide access logs, with ALB providing additional attributes

Gateway Load Balancer (GWLB)

  • Operates at Layer 3 (network layer) as a transparent network gateway combined with load balancing.
  • Designed for deploying, scaling, and managing third-party virtual appliances (firewalls, IDS/IPS, deep packet inspection).
  • Provides a single entry and exit point for all traffic, distributing it to virtual appliances while scaling based on demand.
  • Uses GENEVE encapsulation protocol on port 6081.
  • Supports 5-tuple (default), 3-tuple, or 2-tuple flow stickiness.
  • Accessible via VPC route table entries (not via VIP like ALB/NLB).
  • Target types: IP and Instance.
  • Supports cross-zone load balancing, deletion protection, and connection draining.
  • Supports configurable TCP idle timeout (60–6000 seconds) since September 2024.
  • Supports LCU Reservation since April 2025.
  • Does not support: SSL offloading, security groups, SNI, static/elastic IP, or slow start.

AWS Certification Exam Practice Questions

  • Questions are collected from Internet and the answers are marked as per my knowledge and understanding (which might differ with yours).
  • AWS services are updated everyday and both the answers and questions might be outdated soon, so research accordingly.
  • AWS exam questions are not updated to keep up the pace with AWS updates, so even if the underlying feature has changed the question might not be updated
  • Open to further feedback, discussion and correction.
  1. A company wants to use load balancer for their application. However, the company wants to forward the requests without any header modification. What service should the company use?
    1. Classic Load Balancer
    2. Network Load Balancer
    3. Application Load Balancer
    4. Use Route 53
  2. A Solutions Architect is building an Amazon ECS-based web application that requires that headers are not modified when being forwarded to Amazon ECS. Which load balancer should the Architect use?
    1. Application Load Balancer
    2. Network Load Balancer
    3. A virtual load balancer appliance from AWS marketplace
    4. Classic Load Balancer
  3. An application tier currently hosts two web services on the same set of instances, listening on different ports. Which AWS service should a solutions architect use to route traffic to the service based on the incoming request?
    1. AWS Application Load Balancer
    2. Amazon CloudFront
    3. Amazon Route 53
    4. AWS Classic Load Balancer
  4. A Solutions Architect needs to deploy an HTTP/HTTPS service on Amazon EC2 instances with support for WebSockets using load balancers. How can the Architect meet these requirements?
    1. Configure a Network Load balancer.
    2. Configure an Application Load Balancer.
    3. Configure a Classic Load Balancer.
    4. Configure a Layer-4 Load Balancer.
  5. A company is hosting an application in AWS for third party access. The third party needs to whitelist the application based on the IP. Which AWS service can the company use in the whitelisting of the IP address?
    1. AWS Application Load Balancer
    2. AWS Classic Load balancer
    3. AWS Network Load Balancer
    4. AWS Route 53
  6. A company needs to deploy inline virtual firewall appliances to inspect all traffic entering and leaving their VPC. The solution must scale automatically with traffic. Which load balancer type should they use?
    1. Application Load Balancer
    2. Network Load Balancer
    3. Classic Load Balancer
    4. Gateway Load Balancer
  7. A solutions architect needs to implement mutual TLS authentication for an application behind a load balancer to verify client certificates. Which load balancer supports this natively?
    1. Application Load Balancer
    2. Network Load Balancer
    3. Classic Load Balancer
    4. Gateway Load Balancer
  8. A company wants to perform blue/green deployments with their Network Load Balancer by gradually shifting traffic between two target groups. Which NLB feature enables this?
    1. Path-based routing
    2. Slow start mode
    3. Weighted target groups
    4. Cross-zone load balancing
  9. An organization wants to prepare their Network Load Balancer for a planned marketing event that will cause a sudden spike in traffic. Which feature should they use?
    1. Cross-zone load balancing
    2. Load Balancer Capacity Unit (LCU) Reservation
    3. Target group health configuration
    4. Slow start mode
  10. A company running a mobile gaming application needs ultra-low latency load balancing with session stickiness that survives client IP changes due to mobile network roaming. Which protocol and load balancer combination best meets this need?
    1. ALB with cookie-based stickiness
    2. NLB with TCP 5-tuple stickiness
    3. NLB with QUIC protocol using Connection ID stickiness
    4. CLB with session cookies

References

AWS ELB Monitoring

AWS ELB Monitoring

  • Elastic Load Balancing publishes data points to CloudWatch about the load balancers and back-end instances
  • Elastic Load Balancing reports metrics to CloudWatch only when requests are flowing through the load balancer.
    • If there are requests flowing through the load balancer, Elastic Load Balancing measures and sends its metrics in 60-second intervals.
    • If there are no requests flowing through the load balancer or no data for a metric, the metric is not reported.

CloudWatch Metrics

  • HealthyHostCount, UnHealthyHostCount
    • Number of healthy and unhealthy instances registered with the load balancer.
    • Most useful statistics are average, min, and max
  • RequestCount
    • Number of requests completed or connections made during the specified interval (1 or 5 minutes).
    • Most useful statistic is sum
  • Latency
    • Time elapsed, in seconds, after the request leaves the load balancer until the headers of the response are received.
    • Most useful statistic is average
  • SurgeQueueLength
    • Total number of requests that are pending routing.
    • Load balancer queues a request if it is unable to establish a connection with a healthy instance in order to route the request.
    • Maximum size of the queue is 1,024. Additional requests are rejected when the queue is full.
    • Most useful statistic is max, because it represents the peak of queued requests.
  • SpilloverCount
    • The total number of requests that were rejected because the surge queue is full. Should ideally be 0
    • Most useful statistic is sum.
  • HTTPCode_ELB_4XX, HTTPCode_ELB_5XX
    • Client and Server error code generated by the load balancer
    • Most useful statistic is sum.
  • HTTPCode_Backend_2XX, HTTPCode_Backend_3XX, HTTPCode_Backend_4XX, HTTPCode_Backend_5XX
    • Number of HTTP response codes generated by registered instances
    • Most useful statistic is sum.

Elastic Load Balancer Access Logs

  • Elastic Load Balancing provides access logs that capture detailed information about all requests sent to your load balancer.
  • Each log contains information such as the time the request was received, the client’s IP address, latencies, request paths, and server responses.
  • Elastic Load Balancing captures the logs and stores them in the Amazon S3 bucket
  • Access logging is disabled by default and can be enabled without any additional charge. You are only charged for S3 storage

CloudTrail Logs

  • AWS CloudTrail can be used to capture all calls to the Elastic Load Balancing API made by or on behalf of your AWS account and either made using Elastic Load Balancing API directly or indirectly through the AWS Management Console or AWS CLI
  • CloudTrail stores the information as log files in an Amazon S3 bucket that you specify.
  • Logs collected by CloudTrail can be used to monitor the activity of your load balancers and determine what API call was made, what source IP address was used, who made the call, when it was made, and so on

AWS Certification Exam Practice Questions

  • Questions are collected from Internet and the answers are marked as per my knowledge and understanding (which might differ with yours).
  • AWS services are updated everyday and both the answers and questions might be outdated soon, so research accordingly.
  • AWS exam questions are not updated to keep up the pace with AWS updates, so even if the underlying feature has changed the question might not be updated
  • Open to further feedback, discussion and correction.
  1. An admin is planning to monitor the ELB. Which of the below mentioned services does not help the admin capture the monitoring information about the ELB activity
    1. ELB Access logs
    2. ELB health check
    3. CloudWatch metrics
    4. ELB API calls with CloudTrail
  2. A customer needs to capture all client connection information from their load balancer every five minutes. The company wants to use this data for analyzing traffic patterns and troubleshooting their applications. Which of the following options meets the customer requirements?
    1. Enable AWS CloudTrail for the load balancer.
    2. Enable access logs on the load balancer.
    3. Install the Amazon CloudWatch Logs agent on the load balancer.
    4. Enable Amazon CloudWatch metrics on the load balancer
  3. Your supervisor has requested a way to analyze traffic patterns for your application. You need to capture all connection information from your load balancer every 10 minutes. Pick a solution from below. Choose the correct answer:
    1. Enable access logs on the load balancer
    2. Create a custom metric CloudWatch filter on your load balancer
    3. Use a CloudWatch Logs Agent
    4. Use AWS CloudTrail with your load balancer

References

Elastic Load Balance developer guide